You may find:
Mixed Views About Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention
Tag：hiv prevention
aids prevention |
 1093 Viewers|  hivinkenya 2009-04-18 01:20:52 Publish:The answers to the above questions are all 'yes'; there is overwhelming evidence for an affirmative answer to each one. But does Kenya or any other developing country have any of these benefits? Well, no, that is why they are called developing countries. Underdevelopment and retrogressive development are not new and these issues have been discussed in one form or other for many decades. But just recognising their desirability doesn't give rise to development. The knowledge that these are all good things, necessary for development and for the insurance of human rights, has not given rise to their promotion. So when I see an article entitled '[Male c]ircumcision does reduce the risk of HIV, say researchers' I am pleased to hear it. But which developing country has the facilities, resources and personnel to carry out millions of circumcisions safely and to continue to circumcise all newborn males (either shortly after birth or later, when informed consent is possible)? Kenya does not have presently have the health capacity required. Evidence has shown that the level of adverse effects relating to circumcision is nearly 20% when the operation is carried out in a clinical setting and around 35% in traditional settings. Those who presently don't go for circumcision, usually for reasons associated with the traditions of their tribe, may be more likely to choose a clinical setting. But with statistics like that they could be forgiven for opting to remain uncircumcised. Kenya does not have the capacity required to control most of the infectious diseases that are endemic in the country, diseases that kill more people and diseases that have been around for far longer than HIV. If Kenya had good health, education and other social services, the HIV epidemic would never have got so out of control and some of the expensive prevention measures that are being carried out might have achieved some success by now. In fact, the problem here is not the Cochrane Collaboration publication, entitled Male Circumcision for Prevention of Heterosexual Acquisition of HIV in Men, it's the newspaper article that reports on the original publication. The newspaper article only adds in the final sentence that policy makers need to consider the culture and environment in which MMC is carried out. This is crucial and the Cochrane abstract makes this clear, asking if "[a]t a local level, further research will be needed to assess whether implementing the intervention is feasible, appropriate, and cost-effective in different settings." One might conclude from the newspaper article that because male circumcision can reduce the risk of HIV, that mass male circumcision (MMC) is a good thing, especially in countries that have high HIV prevalence. Circumcision may also protect against herpes simplex virus (HSV), which increases susceptibility to HIV, human papilloma virus (HPV) and various other sexually transmitted infections (STI). But the Cochrane review notes that incidence of adverse events was low in the trials they examined. One would expect the incidence of adverse events to be low, these were randomised controlled trials! The review concludes that circumcision "under these conditions" is a safe procedure. The Cochrane review may have found the evidence conclusive and that could eventually be very significant. But the studies they refer to still raise many unanswered questions. I will not rehearse the various problems with the circumcision trials in question. A quick search of other sites and blogs will give you as much information as you could possibly want. (I haven't had access to the full Cochrane paper, although I am familiar with some of the literature and trials involved.) Mass Male Circumcision (MMC) will not be carried out in ideal conditions in Kenya, not given the present state of Kenyan health services. If there were ideal conditions in Kenya it is unlikely that the country would have need to implement such a huge and costly project as MMC. But a second objection to MMC is the problem of 'disinhibition'. Some circumcised people think they are, more or less, immune to HIV. People have told me that they don't need to use condoms because they are circumcised or even that condoms don't work because they are circumcised. There is a worry that MMC could result in a large number of people believing that they don't need condoms or that they don't need to be careful because they are circumcised. This will not be an easy problem to deal with. There’s often a ‘eureka!’ quality to articles about MMC as a means of reducing transmission of HIV. Why not the same cry with regard to development issues where the solutions are more obvious, such food and food security for the starving, healthcare for the sick and healthy, alike, education for all, safe water and sanitation and a healthy environment? The Cochrane report also concludes with a need for further research. Let's hope policy makers are not as selective as journalists in what they glean from scientific papers. Comments: Cultural and tribal prejudices make MMC in Kenya unlikely to succeed on it's own. You make a brilliant argument for the strengthening of our health systems (nuts and bolts!- the science) to compliment these initiatives. Great stuff. Comments: Thank you! I have said (and heard) for years that the vast majority of deaths and disease in many African countries is due to lack of clean water, lack of food, lack of resources, and many other lacks! I'm pissed that our government has time and money to squander away on dumbass "studies" to justify genital mutilation, meanwhile the people in these countries (whom we COULD help) are just left to hang. Comments: Hi Tamaku, thanks for your comment. Yes, I think any single issue programme on its own will run up against difficulties and any that depend on health services will run up against the problem that national and international policies over the last three decades have decimated the health sector. Comments: Thank you Caroline! In fact, there are a lot of people doing good work here but well used sources of information such as mainstream media are more interested in other things. For them, HIV is (or should I say 'was'?) sexy, poverty, disease and other issues are only sexy every now and then, like when there is a tsunami, a famine or a war. And then, the issue is aired for a while before being replaced by some other story, as if the original problems just went away. Google: hiv prevention Mixed Views About Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention aids prevention |
›› Senior HIV Prevention Expert Job Vacancy
›› HIV/AIDS global update
›› Treating More Than Just HIV/Aids
›› An HIV/AIDS "skeptic" questions my hones
›› More rebuttals of HIV/AIDS "skeptics"
›› Spain: HIV prevention campaign targets b
›› Obamas Budget Proposal Expands HIV Preve
›› Is AIDS Too Big to Fail?
›› Kenyan Politicians Hold Key to HIV Preve
›› "How Do I Look" documentary to be featur
›› Mexico: Puebla Archbishop bans HIV posit
›› Economic Crisis Has Hurt HIV Fight
›› Boycott Roxy Night Club in Orlando Flori
›› Joy HIV/AIDS Ministry, Orlando, Florida
›› Sep. 29th Burlington AIDS Walk and Fundr
›› The AIDS Pandic - Your Thoughts
›› Editorial: Burden of HIV disclosure fall
›› WHEN SWINE FLEW ! HUMANS FALL SICK WORLD
›› Rethinking AIDS: The Dissident Movent
›› Is AIDS still really an issue?
›› Hottie of the Day :: NYC Firefighter Mic
›› Ultra Nate - New Kind Of Medicine (1998)
›› Hear This #2 - Pow Wow!
›› Mixed Views About Male Circumcision for
›› What is the name of the website that lis
›› CIARA'S NEW MEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE SPREAD
›› Medicine to destroy early pregnancy tabl
›› Pill identification - pink, oval, unscor
›› Study aims to improve health of Maori me
›› Tumors of the Epidermis
›› Homework Q -- How was Medicine an import